Wednesday, December 11, 2013

Reaction paper: THE FLY (1958)

The release of The Fly decades ago was a commercial success, partly because of the way it was delivered and partly, the subject it treated. Its relevance to the audience stems from its dealing with human nature as an inevitable obstacle to achieving flawlessness in science breakthroughs. The development of the plot made it interesting; it mystifies in the beginning through the questions posed by the lead characters (and the secretive attitude of the scientist’s wife), then unfolds efficiently the series of events that unlock the mystery in a manner that the build-up of shock gave the movie an overall element of thrill.

The film depicts the scientist as an ever curious man that refuses to settle with his progress until his humanity intervenes. This curiosity fuels his endeavour, as the quest for answers, or in the movie, “the search for truth”, is what a scientist goes through all his life. As long as he knows he is capable of executing an experiment whose results people may have never seen before, he continues the task in pursuit of a sense of achievement and a scientific discovery that will leave a mark in humankind and alter the course of events in history. Two traits common to scientists are manifested by Andre. These  are the lack of expansive vision; listing down the jeopardizing consequences of their research if put to universal use is not prerequisite to releasing that research to the world, and the far-fetched expectations of what their research can convey to humanity.  

Since the film was made during an era of scientific exploration, it might have served as a warning that more than the benefits of a scientific breakthrough, it is crucial for people in that kind of venture to consider the dangers not only to the person in the field but also to those important to him. Before Andrei was crushed using the hydraulic press, the grave effect of his engrossment in his project to family ties was emphasized. He was a bit estranged from his wife and his usual routine with his family was interrupted. Even in making up for the lost time, he found it impossible to part with his work and to avoid integrating this to normal daily activities. The message of the film about science is clear: It is always in our hands to make something as impactful as that beneficial for everyone.

Apple Czarline C. Cruel
2013-59992












No comments:

Post a Comment